top of page

Mattern Helps Am Law 100 Firm Bring Office Services In-house, Saving the Firm $1 Million

This Am Law 100 firm with over 800 attorneys in 27 domestic offices was pleased with its outsourcing provider relationship which serviced the firm’s equipment for all 27 offices and labor for three of the office locations--the firm’s other 24 offices were staffed and managed in-house.

Opportunity:
This Am Law 100 firm with over 800 attorneys in 27 domestic offices was pleased with its outsourcing provider relationship which serviced the firm’s equipment for all 27 offices and labor for three of the office locations--the firm’s other 24 offices were staffed and managed in-house.

Leadership identified managerial inconsistencies, however, between the differing protocols of the outsourcing provider and the firm’s in-house operations, and sought to eliminate this through a firm-wide approach to the staffing portion of office services. In an unusual move, the firm’s Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) sought to bring the outsourced labor in the 3 offices back in-house while preserving the relationship with the outsourcing provider and its equipment services—and do all of this cost-effectively and seamlessly.

The firm’s leadership engaged Mattern as a trusted advisor to lead the process. Mattern had previously worked with the firm as far back as the first outsourcing contract where the consultancy managed the Request for Proposal process, oversaw the implementation of the service provider, and continued on to manage the provider contracts over multiple cycles.

The CAO commented on the initiation of the project:

“In structuring our initial outsourcing agreements, Mattern had ensured provisions were built-in to enable the firm to cancel the equipment, labor or both with no early termination penalties.

This was undoubtedly the key factor that enabled us to make the decision to bring labor in-house cost-effectively, a decision we felt was in our firm’s best interest.”

Process:
After conferring with Mattern, the firm decided to move forward with bringing the outsourced office services labor in-house. The firm exercised the exit clause Mattern had built-in to the outsourcing agreement, terminating the labor portion of the contract and, with Mattern’s guidance, successfully preserved the equipment portion of the relationship while Mattern’s team:

Oversaw the transition from outsourced labor to in-house labor
Monitored transition timeline to assure all milestones were met (timely notifications for all employees not transitioning over)
Reviewed and approved all proposed amendments to the contract
Coordinated any necessary transition requirements
Reviewed final labor invoices to ensure proper billing and/or credits

The firm posted the previously outsourced positions as in-house positions and proactively encouraged the outsourced staff to apply for the internal positions. Out of the outsourced staff from the provider, almost all applied and were hired into the firm, provided pay increases, enhanced benefits, subscribed into the firm’s bonus program--and the firm was able to achieve the targeted savings of over 1 million dollars.

The CAO’s comments: I believe outsourcing works well if you don’t want to manage or don’t have the right internal team to manage internal staff. However, if an organization has a good in-house competence and talent management in developing sound procedures, then they can save on outsourcing while also improving all the elements of employment: better pay, better benefits, better job security which, in turn, decreases turnover. I believe this to be a true win-win for all.

The firm hired an internal firmwide Office Services Manager, whose job it is to manage services staff firmwide, bring staff into the culture of the firm and create a tight knit group. When the pandemic hit, the new office services staff were absolutely instrumental as they stepped up and created new process and workflows to ensure the business continuity of the firm overall.

Takeaways:
The CAO concludes:
Mattern was invaluable in this process. Many consulting firms are ultimately selling their clients in the process of the consultation: a product or service as the solution to the problem. There’s bias built-in. But that’s not the case with Mattern. They were completely unbiased in this, and they listened to the firm’s objectives, analyzing our options with the same level of due diligence as if the engagement were going the other way to outsourcing.

I am a consultant skeptic, so the fact that I think a consultant is great is rare. I recommend Mattern without hesitation.

This Am Law 100, West Coast firm has over 700 attorneys across 15 office locations. The firm had been in a lengthy relationship with its vendor for services provided for its back office, word processing, and MFD equipment at its 7 domestic locations. Over the past year, the firm had negotiated directly with the vendor in an attempt to reduce costs, improve contractual terms, and improve the current management team. Overall, the firm felt it had been overpaying for services received and that its contract was not up to market standards.

West Coast Am Law 100 Firm Achieves Outsourcing and Document Processing Goals, and Decreases Monthly Spend

West Coast Am Law 100 Firm Achieves Outsourcing and Document Processing Goals, and Decreases Monthly Spend

Based in Seattle, this 1,000+ attorney Am Law 50 firm with 16 US offices in 12 states, had expiring outsourcing contracts in place with two vendors in 6 of their offices. Nine of the firm’s other offices were staffed in-house with long term dedicated employees.

Am Law 50 Firm Ensures Employee-Friendly Outsourcing Path while Improving Back Office Efficiency

Am Law 50 Firm Ensures Employee-Friendly Outsourcing Path while Improving Back Office Efficiency

Headquartered in the Midwest, this 193-attorney law firm with 9 offices had just completed a
conversion to Thomson Reuters’ 3E. The next hurdle for firm leadership was the deployment of an
Information Governance (IG) program addressing both their paper and electronic records as well as
improving the firm’s off-site records storage contract. After meeting Rob Mattern at an industry
show and attending a number of Mattern information sessions focusing on implementable IG
polices and retention schedules, the firm selected Mattern to lead the analysis.

Mattern Establishes Information Governance Program and Restructures Off-site Records Storage Contracts to Ease Destruction and Improve Costs for a 28% Savings

Mattern Establishes Information Governance Program and Restructures Off-site Records Storage Contracts to Ease Destruction and Improve Costs for a 28% Savings

This AmLaw 100 firm based in Kansas City, Missouri has a nationwide practice with over 475 attorneys across all offices. The firm sought the expertise of Mattern to assist with its traditional outsourcing needs. While the firm was satisfied with their current provider, they sought to improve terms and reduce costs.

Mattern Assists AmLaw 100 firm to Improve Outsourcing Efficiencies and Costs Through Closed RFP Process, Achieving 22% Savings

Mattern Assists AmLaw 100 firm to Improve Outsourcing Efficiencies and Costs Through Closed RFP Process, Achieving 22% Savings

This NLJ 500 firm is comprised of more than 170 attorneys practicing from offices in Chicago, St. Charles, Rockford, and Woodstock, IL; Indianapolis, IN; St. Louis, MO; and Milwaukee, WI. The firm handles the transactional, labor and employment, and litigation needs of companies across the U.S.

Midwest Based Firm Improves Outsourcing Agreement, Achieving a 16% Reduction in Monthly Costs

Midwest Based Firm Improves Outsourcing Agreement, Achieving a 16% Reduction in Monthly Costs

Headquartered on the East Coast this Am Law 200 firm has 496 attorneys and 700 support staff across 21 offices.  Leadership wanted to analyze renewal options for the firm’s managed services as well as options to refresh the MFD fleet for 8 of the firm’s offices.

Am Law 200 Firm Reshapes Outsourcing, Equipment and Cost Recovery Strategy Post-COVID for Substantial Savings and Increase in Recoveries.

Am Law 200 Firm Reshapes Outsourcing, Equipment and Cost Recovery Strategy Post-COVID for Substantial Savings and Increase in Recoveries.

Headquartered in Boston, Burns & Levinson LLP is a 125 attorney firm in 4 domestic offices. Firm leadership wanted to analyze the value of in-house versus outsourced services so Burns & Levinson could make the right decision to either continue to outsource and improve upon its outsourcing situation or to bring front and back office services in-house.  In addition, the firm wished to refresh its MFD fleet.

Mattern Helps Burns & Levinson Analyze In-House vs. Outsourced Services. Firm Elects to Continue Outsourcing with Significantly Improved Contract

Mattern Helps Burns & Levinson Analyze In-House vs. Outsourced Services. Firm Elects to Continue Outsourcing with Significantly Improved Contract

Phelps Dunbar LLP, a 360-attorney firm based in New Orleans, was experiencing a challenge common to many firms:  unnecessary fees, unrealistic rate increases, and unmet service levels of the firm’s offsite records storage service provider.  At the time, Phelps was engaged with three (3) service providers to service storage needs for their five (5) offices across the south. Not only were there inefficiencies in managing multiple sites, but there were no economies of scale of which to take advantage.

Mattern Helps Phelps Dunbar LLP Stop Unrealistic Rate Increases and Reduce Offsite Records Storage Contract Costs by 10%.

Mattern Helps Phelps Dunbar LLP Stop Unrealistic Rate Increases and Reduce Offsite Records Storage Contract Costs by 10%.

This Philadelphia-based, AmLaw 100 firm has over 650 attorneys in 15 offices.

Historically, the firm's back office equipment decisions had been decentralized, providing a great deal of autonomy to each office to select equipment and service providers that best suited each offices’ needs.

Am Law 100 Firm Achieves Unprecedented SLA, 31% Cost Savings, and Improves Attorney Experience

Am Law 100 Firm Achieves Unprecedented SLA, 31% Cost Savings, and Improves Attorney Experience

Holland & Knight, an Am Law 100 firm with 24 locations and 650,000 cubic feet of off-site records storage, had consolidated their off-site holdings with a national provider.  While leadership was generally pleased with the services of their selected provider, it was unclear how their current pricing and contract terms stood up against the marketplace.

Mattern Helps Holland & Knight Reduce Current Costs by 34.5% and Permanent Withdrawal Fees by $1 Million While Incorporating Information Governance Goals

Mattern Helps Holland & Knight Reduce Current Costs by 34.5% and Permanent Withdrawal Fees by $1 Million While Incorporating Information Governance Goals

This Am Law 100 firm with over 800 attorneys in 27 domestic offices was pleased with its outsourcing provider relationship which serviced the firm’s equipment for all 27 offices and labor for three of the office locations--the firm’s other 24 offices were staffed and managed in-house.

Mattern Helps Am Law 100 Firm Bring Office Services In-house, Saving the Firm $1 Million

Mattern Helps Am Law 100 Firm Bring Office Services In-house, Saving the Firm $1 Million

More Case Studies

bottom of page