top of page

Mattern Assists AmLaw 100 firm to Improve Outsourcing Efficiencies and Costs Through Closed RFP Process, Achieving 22% Savings

This AmLaw 100 firm based in Kansas City, Missouri has a nationwide practice with over 475 attorneys across all offices. The firm sought the expertise of Mattern to assist with its traditional outsourcing needs. While the firm was satisfied with their current provider, they sought to improve terms and reduce costs.

Opportunity:

This AmLaw 100 firm based in Kansas City, Missouri has a nationwide practice with over 475 attorneys across all offices. The firm sought the expertise of Mattern to assist with its traditional outsourcing needs. While the firm was satisfied with their current provider, they sought to improve terms and reduce costs. Mattern recommended a closed Request for Proposal (RFP) process, giving the incumbent service provider the initial opportunity to renew its business, with an option to go to an open market RFP if their response did not meet the firm’s terms and pricing requirements.

In this instance, the firm sought to improve pricing and contractual terms, improve current processes, position its services in alignment with the firm’s five-year plan, and automate metrics and monthly reporting. In particular, the firm expected the current provider to lean on its knowledge of their operations to bring creativity and provide a solution that met its goals while maintaining current service levels.

Based on Mattern’s benchmarks, the firm anticipated a 21% reduction of its current spend.

Process:

Mattern and the firm previously collaborated on a management review of the firm’s outsourcing projects. While Mattern had some foundational knowledge of the firm, it had also undergone significant changes since Mattern’s previous engagement. Mattern first conducted a comprehensive review of the firm’s outsourcing needs, with a new analysis of each office that addressed any operational changes over time.

Mattern did a complete on-site assessment of all outsourced services and equipment at several offices and reviewed the others through extensive interviews with on-site staff and discussions with key personnel. Every assessment included a review of the outsourcing provider’s staffing levels, workflows, processes, and equipment.

Additionally, Mattern reviewed each area of the firm’s operations and provided a complete analysis of its back-office operations, with recommendations moving forward.

The analysis identified an opportunity to improve on the litigation support and e-Discovery work performed by the current service provider. Mattern recommended that the firm explore separating this service and transition it to a Mattern Plan B Cost Recovery® model. This proprietary process allows firms to maximize billable cost recovery revenue by increasing net realizations through restructuring their on-site support services as hard-cost, pass-through disbursements. The firm agreed, and their service provider determined a “fully loaded” transactional rate, whereby the service provider would only charge the firm per transaction – not for individual labor, equipment, technology, supplies, and other costs. This allowed the firm to pay only for the volume of work it generated on a monthly basis. This arrangement also improved cost recovery, as the firm could just pass along transaction fees to clients as appropriate.

Based on Mattern’s understanding of the firm’s needs, cost objectives and required services, the unique RFP offered multiple options, including performing all litigation support and e-Discovery on a transactional basis. The RFP focused on the areas of concern the firm set forth at the outset and issues discovered through Mattern’s analysis.

Result:

The RFP process yielded several viable solutions. After a careful review, the firm elected to utilize Mattern’s recommendation to do litigation support and eDiscovery on a fully loaded transaction cost basis. Additionally, there were other significant changes to the operations, contract, and price. In particular, the firm realized the following changes:

- Significantly improved terms and conditions, including elimination of a non-solicitation clause after 24 months.
- Workflow efficiencies and reduced hours of operation, which allowed for overall staff reduction of 10 full-time employees, while maintaining service levels in all offices.
- Combination of right-sizing, eliminating and maintaining a good percentage of the Multi-Functional Device (MFD) population through extension of leases by 24 months to extend useful life.
- Penalty-based service level agreements.
- Financial incentives.

Overall, due to the changes implemented, in the first year the firm realized a savings of 22% over its current annual spend, surpassing the projected 21% benchmark.

This Am Law 100, West Coast firm has over 700 attorneys across 15 office locations. The firm had been in a lengthy relationship with its vendor for services provided for its back office, word processing, and MFD equipment at its 7 domestic locations. Over the past year, the firm had negotiated directly with the vendor in an attempt to reduce costs, improve contractual terms, and improve the current management team. Overall, the firm felt it had been overpaying for services received and that its contract was not up to market standards.

West Coast Am Law 100 Firm Achieves Outsourcing and Document Processing Goals, and Decreases Monthly Spend

West Coast Am Law 100 Firm Achieves Outsourcing and Document Processing Goals, and Decreases Monthly Spend

Based in Seattle, this 1,000+ attorney Am Law 50 firm with 16 US offices in 12 states, had expiring outsourcing contracts in place with two vendors in 6 of their offices. Nine of the firm’s other offices were staffed in-house with long term dedicated employees.

Am Law 50 Firm Ensures Employee-Friendly Outsourcing Path while Improving Back Office Efficiency

Am Law 50 Firm Ensures Employee-Friendly Outsourcing Path while Improving Back Office Efficiency

Headquartered in the Midwest, this 193-attorney law firm with 9 offices had just completed a
conversion to Thomson Reuters’ 3E. The next hurdle for firm leadership was the deployment of an
Information Governance (IG) program addressing both their paper and electronic records as well as
improving the firm’s off-site records storage contract. After meeting Rob Mattern at an industry
show and attending a number of Mattern information sessions focusing on implementable IG
polices and retention schedules, the firm selected Mattern to lead the analysis.

Mattern Establishes Information Governance Program and Restructures Off-site Records Storage Contracts to Ease Destruction and Improve Costs for a 28% Savings

Mattern Establishes Information Governance Program and Restructures Off-site Records Storage Contracts to Ease Destruction and Improve Costs for a 28% Savings

This AmLaw 100 firm based in Kansas City, Missouri has a nationwide practice with over 475 attorneys across all offices. The firm sought the expertise of Mattern to assist with its traditional outsourcing needs. While the firm was satisfied with their current provider, they sought to improve terms and reduce costs.

Mattern Assists AmLaw 100 firm to Improve Outsourcing Efficiencies and Costs Through Closed RFP Process, Achieving 22% Savings

Mattern Assists AmLaw 100 firm to Improve Outsourcing Efficiencies and Costs Through Closed RFP Process, Achieving 22% Savings

This NLJ 500 firm is comprised of more than 170 attorneys practicing from offices in Chicago, St. Charles, Rockford, and Woodstock, IL; Indianapolis, IN; St. Louis, MO; and Milwaukee, WI. The firm handles the transactional, labor and employment, and litigation needs of companies across the U.S.

Midwest Based Firm Improves Outsourcing Agreement, Achieving a 16% Reduction in Monthly Costs

Midwest Based Firm Improves Outsourcing Agreement, Achieving a 16% Reduction in Monthly Costs

Headquartered on the East Coast this Am Law 200 firm has 496 attorneys and 700 support staff across 21 offices.  Leadership wanted to analyze renewal options for the firm’s managed services as well as options to refresh the MFD fleet for 8 of the firm’s offices.

Am Law 200 Firm Reshapes Outsourcing, Equipment and Cost Recovery Strategy Post-COVID for Substantial Savings and Increase in Recoveries.

Am Law 200 Firm Reshapes Outsourcing, Equipment and Cost Recovery Strategy Post-COVID for Substantial Savings and Increase in Recoveries.

Headquartered in Boston, Burns & Levinson LLP is a 125 attorney firm in 4 domestic offices. Firm leadership wanted to analyze the value of in-house versus outsourced services so Burns & Levinson could make the right decision to either continue to outsource and improve upon its outsourcing situation or to bring front and back office services in-house.  In addition, the firm wished to refresh its MFD fleet.

Mattern Helps Burns & Levinson Analyze In-House vs. Outsourced Services. Firm Elects to Continue Outsourcing with Significantly Improved Contract

Mattern Helps Burns & Levinson Analyze In-House vs. Outsourced Services. Firm Elects to Continue Outsourcing with Significantly Improved Contract

Phelps Dunbar LLP, a 360-attorney firm based in New Orleans, was experiencing a challenge common to many firms:  unnecessary fees, unrealistic rate increases, and unmet service levels of the firm’s offsite records storage service provider.  At the time, Phelps was engaged with three (3) service providers to service storage needs for their five (5) offices across the south. Not only were there inefficiencies in managing multiple sites, but there were no economies of scale of which to take advantage.

Mattern Helps Phelps Dunbar LLP Stop Unrealistic Rate Increases and Reduce Offsite Records Storage Contract Costs by 10%.

Mattern Helps Phelps Dunbar LLP Stop Unrealistic Rate Increases and Reduce Offsite Records Storage Contract Costs by 10%.

This Philadelphia-based, AmLaw 100 firm has over 650 attorneys in 15 offices.

Historically, the firm's back office equipment decisions had been decentralized, providing a great deal of autonomy to each office to select equipment and service providers that best suited each offices’ needs.

Am Law 100 Firm Achieves Unprecedented SLA, 31% Cost Savings, and Improves Attorney Experience

Am Law 100 Firm Achieves Unprecedented SLA, 31% Cost Savings, and Improves Attorney Experience

Holland & Knight, an Am Law 100 firm with 24 locations and 650,000 cubic feet of off-site records storage, had consolidated their off-site holdings with a national provider.  While leadership was generally pleased with the services of their selected provider, it was unclear how their current pricing and contract terms stood up against the marketplace.

Mattern Helps Holland & Knight Reduce Current Costs by 34.5% and Permanent Withdrawal Fees by $1 Million While Incorporating Information Governance Goals

Mattern Helps Holland & Knight Reduce Current Costs by 34.5% and Permanent Withdrawal Fees by $1 Million While Incorporating Information Governance Goals

This Am Law 100 firm with over 800 attorneys in 27 domestic offices was pleased with its outsourcing provider relationship which serviced the firm’s equipment for all 27 offices and labor for three of the office locations--the firm’s other 24 offices were staffed and managed in-house.

Mattern Helps Am Law 100 Firm Bring Office Services In-house, Saving the Firm $1 Million

Mattern Helps Am Law 100 Firm Bring Office Services In-house, Saving the Firm $1 Million

More Case Studies

bottom of page