Mattern Assists AmLaw 100 firm to Improve Outsourcing Efficiencies and Costs Through Closed RFP Process, Achieving 22% Savings

This AmLaw 100 firm based in Kansas City, Missouri has a nationwide practice with over 475 attorneys across all offices. In 2016, the firm sought the expertise of Mattern to assist with its traditional outsourcing needs. While the firm was satisfied with their current provider, they sought to improve terms and reduce costs. Mattern recommended a closed Request for Proposal (RFP) process, giving the incumbent service provider the initial opportunity to renew its business, with an option to go to an open market RFP if their response did not meet the firm’s terms and pricing requirements.

OPPORTUNITY
This AmLaw 100 firm based in Kansas City, Missouri has a nationwide practice with over 475 attorneys across all offices. In 2016, the firm sought the expertise of Mattern to assist with its traditional outsourcing needs. While the firm was satisfied with their current provider, they sought to improve terms and reduce costs. Mattern recommended a closed Request for Proposal (RFP) process, giving the incumbent service provider the initial opportunity to renew its business, with an option to go to an open market RFP if their response did not meet the firm’s terms and pricing requirements.

In this instance, the firm sought to improve pricing and contractual terms, improve current processes, position its services in alignment with the firm’s five-year plan, and automate metrics and monthly reporting. In particular, the firm expected the current provider to lean on its knowledge of their operations to bring creativity and provide a solution that met its goals while maintaining current service levels.

Based on Mattern’s benchmarks, the firm anticipated a 21% reduction of its current spend.

Process: Mattern and the firm previously collaborated on a management review of the firm’s outsourcing projects. While Mattern had some foundational knowledge of the firm, it had also undergone significant changes since Mattern’s previous engagement. Mattern first conducted a comprehensive review of the firm’s outsourcing needs, with a new analysis of each office that addressed any operational changes over time.

Mattern did a complete on-site assessment of all outsourced services and equipment at several offices and reviewed the others through extensive interviews with on-site staff and discussions with key personnel. Every assessment included a review of the outsourcing provider’s staffing levels, workflows, processes, and equipment.

Additionally, Mattern reviewed each area of the firm’s operations and provided a complete analysis of its back-office operations, with recommendations moving forward.

The analysis identified an opportunity to improve on the litigation support and e-Discovery work performed by the current service provider. Mattern recommended that the firm explore separating this service and transition it to a Mattern Plan B Cost Recovery® model. This proprietary process allows firms to maximize billable cost recovery revenue by increasing net realizations through restructuring their on-site support services as hard-cost, pass-through disbursements. The firm agreed, and their service provider determined a “fully loaded” transactional rate, whereby the service provider would only charge the firm per transaction – not for individual labor, equipment, technology, supplies, and other costs. This allowed the firm to pay only for the volume of work it generated on a monthly basis. This arrangement also improved cost recovery, as the firm could just pass along transaction fees to clients as appropriate.

Based on Mattern’s understanding of the firm’s needs, cost objectives and required services, the unique RFP offered multiple options, including performing all litigation support and e-Discovery on a transactional basis. The RFP focused on the areas of concern the firm set forth at the outset and issues discovered through Mattern’s analysis.

RESULT
The RFP process yielded several viable solutions. After a careful review, the firm elected to utilize Mattern’s recommendation to do litigation support and eDiscovery on a fully loaded transaction cost basis. Additionally, there were other significant changes to the operations, contract, and price. In particular, the firm realized the following changes:
- Significantly improved terms and conditions, including elimination of a non-solicitation clause after 24 months.
- Workflow efficiencies and reduced hours of operation, which allowed for overall staff reduction of 10 full-time employees, while maintaining service levels in all offices.
- Combination of right-sizing, eliminating and maintaining a good percentage of the Multi-Functional Device (MFD) population through extension of leases by 24 months to extend useful life.
- Penalty-based service level agreements.
- Financial incentives.

Overall, due to the changes implemented, in the first year the firm realized a savings of 22% over its current annual spend, surpassing the projected 21% benchmark.

Establishing and maintaining a successful contract negotiation is a situation in which there needs to be two winners, not a winner and a loser. While every firm wants to procure the best contracts through informed negotiation, it is also important to preserve the long term, industry relationships with the vendors. You’ve got to pick the competitors wisely, and you must know the best practices in your region. To that end, there’s a great deal of strategy involved in an Open RFP; one might say an art.

Prominent IP Law Firm Achieves Win-Win & 10 Year Contract with Open Off-Site Records RFP

With more than 1,100 lawyers and consulting professionals in 24 offices worldwide, this firm is a leading business and litigation practice with global reach. As is the trend with many successful large firms, this particular one had undergone a merger in 2009 with an established Atlanta-based firm.

National Firm Gains 33% Reduction in Permanent Withdrawal Fees and 22% Monthly Savings on Outsourcing Contracts in Dual RFPs

Best Best & Krieger, LLP is a 180-attorney law firm that has been in business for more than a century. The firm has grown to include several dynamic practice groups across eight offices throughout California.

Mattern & Associates Spearheads Vendor Consolidation, Achieves 23% Monthly Savings in Support Services for Best Best & Krieger

Established in 1891, Best Best & Krieger (BBK) is a highly regarded, full-service law firm of over 350 professionals, including more than 200 attorneys across nine offices in California and in Washington, D.C. Maria D’Aquila is the firm’s Operations Manager.

Mattern’s Phase III Contract Compliance Program Achieves Maximum Value for Best Best & Krieger’s Office Supplies Contracts

This 320 attorney, AmLaw 200, Houston-based firm was in the throes of implementing a “work-cell” environment for their secretaries per practice area. The restructuring of staff and office layout required a different output strategy to be deployed in order to provide the tools and technology within close proximity to the work-cells, while also looking to reduce expenses. However, the firm had several expiration dates for their existing multi-function devices, requiring a creative plan for addressing replacements that also substantially improved the convenience and efficiency for the new work-cell environment.

AmLaw 200 Firm Shifts to Work-Cell Environment, Captures 24% in Cost Savings while Substantially Improving Operational Efficiency

This AmLaw 200, Chicago-based firm had taken advantage of outsourcing methods over the last couple of years; however, its current outsourcing and equipment contract was soon to expire. Since the firm renewed with the incumbent vendor the previous five years, they were interested in learning what other service bureaus were providing in the outsourcing marketplace. The firm also desired to determine whether they were staffed appropriately and operating under industry best practices and service levels with competitive pricing.

Chicago-based Firm Improves Workflow and Achieves 33% Annual Savings

This 250 attorney, Am Law 200, Washington D.C.-based firm had specific areas in which it was struggling; in particular, they were finding it difficult to keep current with technology, flexing to meet demand, and recovering costs for the internal systems and storage related to litigation support services (e-Discovery).

Am Law 200 Firm Gains Competitive Advantage and Charge Back Model to Recoup Costs for eDiscovery Managed Services

This 350 attorney, Am Law 200 firm based in Ohio had decided to outsource their in-sourced back-office operations and multi-function devices (MFDs) on a firm-wide basis five years prior. The contract was expiring and the firm was now considering outsourcing the on-site centralized Records and Information Management functions. As a result, the firm was interested in what other outsourcing companies’ capabilities were in the records space, how they may improve current services to the firm, and whether they had a competitive contract.

Am Law 200 Firm Saves on Costs, Improves Service Levels by Outsourcing Records and Selecting New MFD Vendor

This 250 attorney, AmLaw 200, Washington D.C.-based firm has 11 offices nationwide. The firm had multiple offsite records storage contracts in place and was interested in investigating cost-savings and efficiencies by consolidating vendors as well as creating a short and long-term strategy to reduce their offsite storage commitments.

Am Law 200 Firm Removes Permanent Withdrawal Fees, Consolidates Vendors and Saves 24% in Off-Site Record Storage

This 225 attorney, Nashville-based firm was looking to improve outsourcing workflow efficiencies, service level and increase equipment capabilities. The firm had been with its current outsourcing and equipment provider for over a decade and felt that the level of off-site management interaction and proactive presentation of strategic initiatives were minimal.

Nashville-based Firm Improves Outsourcing Workflow Efficiencies, Service and Equipment Capabilities: Achieves 51% Savings

This 320 attorney, AmLaw 200, Kansas City-based firm was looking to implement changes in production workflow in order to maximize efficiencies and substantially reduce consumption and reliance on paper. With the expiration of its current Canon Multi-Function Device (MFD) fleet pending as well as an aging printer fleet, the firm’s operations and IT teams were seeking a comprehensive solution to meet the current and future needs of the firm.

AmLaw 200 Firm Leverages Technology & Equipment to Improve Workflow, Saves $1 Million over 5 Years