top of page

Mattern Helps Burns & Levinson Analyze In-House vs. Outsourced Services. Firm Elects to Continue Outsourcing with Significantly Improved Contract

Headquartered in Boston, Burns & Levinson LLP is a 125 attorney firm in 4 domestic offices. Firm leadership wanted to analyze the value of in-house versus outsourced services so Burns & Levinson could make the right decision to either continue to outsource and improve upon its outsourcing situation or to bring front and back office services in-house. In addition, the firm wished to refresh its MFD fleet.

Opportunity:
Headquartered in Boston, Burns & Levinson LLP is a 125 attorney firm in 4 domestic offices. Firm leadership wanted to analyze the value of in-house versus outsourced services so Burns & Levinson could make the right decision to either continue to outsource and improve upon its outsourcing situation or to bring front and back office services in-house. In addition, the firm wished to refresh its MFD fleet.

Burns’ leadership selected Mattern to lead the project. The firm’s objectives at the onset of the engagement included:

Unbiased assessment of current outsourced back and front office services:

- Which services might still be required – how can they be improved/streamlined?
- What services are not provided today, but needed in the future?
- What are the best practices for such services?
- How to best support satellite offices?

Recommendations for bringing services back in-house:

- What would be the pros and cons?
- What would be the appropriate staffing levels and associated costs?
- Obtain monthly reporting with required stats from MFD provider.

Process:

Mattern performed a comprehensive review of the firm’s outsourced staff and services provided along with the firm’s MFD fleet based on usage during Covid while also accounting for post-Covid scenarios in its recommendations.

Based upon its evaluation and utilizing its industry knowledge and benchmarks, Mattern made key recommendations for both bringing operations in-house and continuing with outsourced services, all which improved service levels, elevated reporting and metrics, and improved contractual terms to ensure the provider lived up to firm expectations.

Mattern’s recommendations included:

- An option to bring operations in-house, including an overview of resources required to ensure a successful operation.
- A secondary option to continue with outsourced operations with a focus to improve upon services provided, integration of unstaffed offices, reporting, hospitality and audio/visual needs.
- The firm also had Mattern evaluate the advisability of creating a dedicated client experience coordinator position in lieu of reception.
- Mattern provided extensive contractual recommendations to ensure the firm had a competitive, firm-friendly agreement with mechanisms in place to ensure the firm’s expectations were met.
- Right-size MFD fleet based on current and future, post-Covid output needs.
- After careful evaluation, the leadership at Burns & Levinson ultimately elected to keep operations outsourced, and Mattern assisted the firm in structuring a Request for Proposal (RFP) which captured the outsourcing recommendations from the evaluation process.

The RFP was sent to four (4) labor and equipment service providers including the incumbent. After reviewing responses from all service providers and meeting with each, the firm selected a new provider, Canon, to partner with for labor and equipment for a 5-year term.

Results:
A new contract was entered into with Canon incorporating key labor, equipment and contractual elements missing from the prior agreement to ensure a future successful relationship:

- Labor included a Community Experience Lead to focus on hospitality and audio/visual needs.
- Detailed service level agreements included to ensure proper service delivery.
Labor and equipment scorecard with performance standards and penalties for service failures included to encourage high-level services.
- MFD fleet right-sized and standardized.
- Labor contract terms updated to include key items such as staff underage and untrained backfill credits, removal of non-solicitation, 100% backup for vacations and absences, staff turnover strictures, reporting requirements, and escalation caps.
- Equipment contract terms updated to include key items such as reporting requirements, uptime requirements, response time requirements, fixed pricing, flexibility, replacement of unsatisfactory equipment, and no installation or removal costs.

Client Comments:
Mattern has been terrific throughout this entire process and has taken time to make certain we are seeing the whole picture and thinking about all aspects of the RFP and onboarding our new provider. Mattern has been great!
- Jill Couillard, Operations Manager

Mattern’s attention to detail has taken away (or at least reduced) my need to monitor every detail. They have been strategic about the process, careful in presentations, truthful in argumentation, and simply a pleasure to work with.
- Paul Morton, Chief Operating Officer

This Am Law 100, West Coast firm has over 700 attorneys across 15 office locations. The firm had been in a lengthy relationship with its vendor for services provided for its back office, word processing, and MFD equipment at its 7 domestic locations. Over the past year, the firm had negotiated directly with the vendor in an attempt to reduce costs, improve contractual terms, and improve the current management team. Overall, the firm felt it had been overpaying for services received and that its contract was not up to market standards.

West Coast Am Law 100 Firm Achieves Outsourcing and Document Processing Goals, and Decreases Monthly Spend

West Coast Am Law 100 Firm Achieves Outsourcing and Document Processing Goals, and Decreases Monthly Spend

Based in Seattle, this 1,000+ attorney Am Law 50 firm with 16 US offices in 12 states, had expiring outsourcing contracts in place with two vendors in 6 of their offices. Nine of the firm’s other offices were staffed in-house with long term dedicated employees.

Am Law 50 Firm Ensures Employee-Friendly Outsourcing Path while Improving Back Office Efficiency

Am Law 50 Firm Ensures Employee-Friendly Outsourcing Path while Improving Back Office Efficiency

Headquartered in the Midwest, this 193-attorney law firm with 9 offices had just completed a
conversion to Thomson Reuters’ 3E. The next hurdle for firm leadership was the deployment of an
Information Governance (IG) program addressing both their paper and electronic records as well as
improving the firm’s off-site records storage contract. After meeting Rob Mattern at an industry
show and attending a number of Mattern information sessions focusing on implementable IG
polices and retention schedules, the firm selected Mattern to lead the analysis.

Mattern Establishes Information Governance Program and Restructures Off-site Records Storage Contracts to Ease Destruction and Improve Costs for a 28% Savings

Mattern Establishes Information Governance Program and Restructures Off-site Records Storage Contracts to Ease Destruction and Improve Costs for a 28% Savings

This AmLaw 100 firm based in Kansas City, Missouri has a nationwide practice with over 475 attorneys across all offices. The firm sought the expertise of Mattern to assist with its traditional outsourcing needs. While the firm was satisfied with their current provider, they sought to improve terms and reduce costs.

Mattern Assists AmLaw 100 firm to Improve Outsourcing Efficiencies and Costs Through Closed RFP Process, Achieving 22% Savings

Mattern Assists AmLaw 100 firm to Improve Outsourcing Efficiencies and Costs Through Closed RFP Process, Achieving 22% Savings

This NLJ 500 firm is comprised of more than 170 attorneys practicing from offices in Chicago, St. Charles, Rockford, and Woodstock, IL; Indianapolis, IN; St. Louis, MO; and Milwaukee, WI. The firm handles the transactional, labor and employment, and litigation needs of companies across the U.S.

Midwest Based Firm Improves Outsourcing Agreement, Achieving a 16% Reduction in Monthly Costs

Midwest Based Firm Improves Outsourcing Agreement, Achieving a 16% Reduction in Monthly Costs

Headquartered on the East Coast this Am Law 200 firm has 496 attorneys and 700 support staff across 21 offices.  Leadership wanted to analyze renewal options for the firm’s managed services as well as options to refresh the MFD fleet for 8 of the firm’s offices.

Am Law 200 Firm Reshapes Outsourcing, Equipment and Cost Recovery Strategy Post-COVID for Substantial Savings and Increase in Recoveries.

Am Law 200 Firm Reshapes Outsourcing, Equipment and Cost Recovery Strategy Post-COVID for Substantial Savings and Increase in Recoveries.

Headquartered in Boston, Burns & Levinson LLP is a 125 attorney firm in 4 domestic offices. Firm leadership wanted to analyze the value of in-house versus outsourced services so Burns & Levinson could make the right decision to either continue to outsource and improve upon its outsourcing situation or to bring front and back office services in-house.  In addition, the firm wished to refresh its MFD fleet.

Mattern Helps Burns & Levinson Analyze In-House vs. Outsourced Services. Firm Elects to Continue Outsourcing with Significantly Improved Contract

Mattern Helps Burns & Levinson Analyze In-House vs. Outsourced Services. Firm Elects to Continue Outsourcing with Significantly Improved Contract

Phelps Dunbar LLP, a 360-attorney firm based in New Orleans, was experiencing a challenge common to many firms:  unnecessary fees, unrealistic rate increases, and unmet service levels of the firm’s offsite records storage service provider.  At the time, Phelps was engaged with three (3) service providers to service storage needs for their five (5) offices across the south. Not only were there inefficiencies in managing multiple sites, but there were no economies of scale of which to take advantage.

Mattern Helps Phelps Dunbar LLP Stop Unrealistic Rate Increases and Reduce Offsite Records Storage Contract Costs by 10%.

Mattern Helps Phelps Dunbar LLP Stop Unrealistic Rate Increases and Reduce Offsite Records Storage Contract Costs by 10%.

This Philadelphia-based, AmLaw 100 firm has over 650 attorneys in 15 offices.

Historically, the firm's back office equipment decisions had been decentralized, providing a great deal of autonomy to each office to select equipment and service providers that best suited each offices’ needs.

Am Law 100 Firm Achieves Unprecedented SLA, 31% Cost Savings, and Improves Attorney Experience

Am Law 100 Firm Achieves Unprecedented SLA, 31% Cost Savings, and Improves Attorney Experience

Holland & Knight, an Am Law 100 firm with 24 locations and 650,000 cubic feet of off-site records storage, had consolidated their off-site holdings with a national provider.  While leadership was generally pleased with the services of their selected provider, it was unclear how their current pricing and contract terms stood up against the marketplace.

Mattern Helps Holland & Knight Reduce Current Costs by 34.5% and Permanent Withdrawal Fees by $1 Million While Incorporating Information Governance Goals

Mattern Helps Holland & Knight Reduce Current Costs by 34.5% and Permanent Withdrawal Fees by $1 Million While Incorporating Information Governance Goals

This Am Law 100 firm with over 800 attorneys in 27 domestic offices was pleased with its outsourcing provider relationship which serviced the firm’s equipment for all 27 offices and labor for three of the office locations--the firm’s other 24 offices were staffed and managed in-house.

Mattern Helps Am Law 100 Firm Bring Office Services In-house, Saving the Firm $1 Million

Mattern Helps Am Law 100 Firm Bring Office Services In-house, Saving the Firm $1 Million

More Case Studies

bottom of page